Do You See What I See Take II

And since I am pointing to “subtle” shifts in already problematic media, I thought I’d play one more with you readers, this time from the land of “Super friends”:

Original Zan and Jayna

co Hanna Barbara

The originals were part of the DC comic franchise and became popular as part of the Hanna Barbara hour, and other HB offerings, on Saturday morning cartoons.

Smallville’s Zan & Jayna

co Warner Bros

It may be harder for you all to notice the difference this time around unless you are familiar with racial encoding in similar comic book characters for the same period as the original Zan and Jayna.

Suffice it to say that while The Wonder Twins original back story was that they were aliens, many saw them as people of color because of their visual similarity to other characters, usually stereotypical orientalist villains, and embraced them as one of the few positive images in this vein.

In typical Smallville fashion, Zan and Jayna have been white washed by both casting white actors and replacing their original storyline with the idea that they are meteor infected small town white teens.

Again, this is not really worth the amount of blog space I am giving it in isolation but certainly worth documenting as one of many moments in which Smallville has failed to depict diversity in any significant or lasting way. After all, though Smallville started out with a racially diverse cast, it’s Asian-Canadian female lead was in a role originally written as white and the character was never updated to reflect the background of the actress playing her. It’s African American character/actor original faired much better but soon degenerated to stereotype before ultimately being written out.  Other characters on the show have been cast using white or white appearing actors for Latin@ roles & were written to be read as white by those who did not know their back story; while characters like Victor Stone were among the most under utilized.

In the sense of a pattern of increasing homogeneity, even at the expense of actual characters of color, The Wonder Twins reboot is worthy of note. (And yes, there is far more to complain about with said reboot than just race.) Outside of this context, not so much …

Why Advertising Matters – Boycott of Couples’ Retreat

Like most people, I was completely uninterested in the release of Couples’ Retreat earlier this year. For me, the previews oscillated between blatant rip-offs of Sarah Marshall (also starring Kristin Bell) and rehash of every character Vince Vaughn has played in the last 5 years.  When the trailers weren’t serving up rewarmed left overs you should have thrown out years ago, they were trading in obvious racial stereotypes that did not even deserve mention on this blog. Not only does the film have the obligatory black couple (the only couple of color) but the gags in the advertising rely on his enormous body and its disrobing to the shock and appalled interest of the mostly uptight white women in the other couples. In short, Couples’ Retreat was a throw away from jump.

However, I find myself revisiting the shlock precisely because of the racial component of their advertising. What started out as laughably marginal racism, ie so expected it bores, has turned into full erasure as the film has begun its European distribution. Look at the film’s movie posters below and see if you can spot the issue:

American Release Poster

British Release Poster

Did you see it?

I know. I know. It might be hard to catch given how marginal the black couple was in the original poster, but there is a marked difference from placing a black couple in the far background and omitting them all together when the film is supposedly about the struggles of all four couples.  And while I don’t doubt the original poster accurately reflects the significance of the black couple to the film, ie as background sight gags with little or no real story arcs, omitting them all together speaks volumes about the investment certain hard hitters in Hollywood’s comedy genre have in racially equality vs. the appearance there of, in their films.

Interestingly, British audiences agree. Several groups are currently boycotting Couples’ Retreat based on what they are calling “racist advertising.” They are also raising awareness about erasure in films in general as a result of this action.

To be honest, when this protest reached me, my first thought was: I don’t know what is worse, having the big black body trotted out repeatedly for laughs/ shock value or having black people omitted all together from advertising? Afterall, they seem to be two sides of an equally offensive coin.

Ultimately, Couples’ Retreat is no more guilty of these kinds of racially laden advertising practices than any other film of its ilk, think Ben Stiller’s or Jack Black’s films for example. As the lesser entry in the genre it will be all the more exempt from critique in the U.S., the country producing all of these films, because no one watched it anyway. And yet, it is our ongoing willingness to ignore advertising and/or to shift discussion of how that advertising plays into various forms of oppression to discussions of “intent”, “content”,  oppression olympics, and “my black friend laughed” discussions that allow these heavy hitters in N. American comedy to keep on perpetuating a world view that not only imagines a mostly white, if not exclusively white world, but trades on stereotypes and erasures of people of color and other marginalized groups.

Couples’ Retreat is hardly worth this much attention on its own, but as another example of the recent trend in N. American comedy, I don’t think we can ignore it.

Transgender Day of Remembrance 2009

Before I begin today’s post in earnest, the activist in me wants to draw your attention to a new map documenting anti-trans violence globally:

The social science methodologist in me however has to caution people passing it along.

The map above represents the level of reported incidences of murder of a transgender person around the world compiled by Transgender Europe. Because of the number of murders that are not classified as transphobic these numbers do not reflect the actual incidences of violence against transgendered people. Many transgender advocates in the U.S. have pointed to the fact that not classifying transphobia as a hate crime, or including transgender identity as a protected identity in the law, has led to the re-classification of anti-trans violence or the misidentification of transphobic murder in police records & court documents. So while this map may give some people comfort in thinking that they live in a country free of transphobia or at least transphobic murder, the reality is they may live in a country with the most abuse because they have no laws or language, or will, to track abuse against transgender communities. Documenting that abuse is one of the first steps in stopping it, so the white spaces on this map should cause as much, if not more, concern as the red ones; particularly since the red spaces are places that have some kind of language or recognized, though degraded, population of trans or genderqueer people in them or internationally known transgender communities or districts which make them both more recognizable by authorities documenting their deaths and easier to locate for people wanting to torture or kill them.

That being said, that map, like the list of names of lives lost has left me once again wondering how to move from documentation and sorrow to action. According to the Gender Education and Advocacy Group, 1+ transgendered people lose their lives every month in the United States and these are only the ones reported in the media. They die not because we don’t know people are being brutally killed but because we have not made it a priority to ensure these murders stop and the cissupremacy that allows them ends. Many in the feminist community don’t consider transgender issues part of our work, in the same way that many in the queer community include transgender as a letter in our ever growing alphabet but continue to center cis rights.

Every year on this blog I scour the internet for all of the names of transgender people who have not yet been added to the official list of lost lives and add them to the list here. And every year, there is always at least one well known (at least in the queer community) transgender person who has died so close to this day that their name rings out as a particularly tragic reminder that after 11 years of honoring transgendered lives lost, we are still no closer to ending transphobia.

This year that person is Jorge Steven Lopez Mercado who was beaten, burned, dismembered and decapitated by a man who “thought he was a woman.” Despite the obvious indication of transphobia, the reporting on Lopez Mercado’s death have often failed to identify this as a factor illustrating the problem with long term official documentation of transbashing and anti-trans murder. According to friends in PR, Lopez Mercado identified as an out gay man (hence why I am using male pronouns) but was also exploring his gender identity and many believe he was struggling with coming out as a woman; despite the fact he was wearing a dress @ the time of his murder, this part of the story is only emerging as a result of transgender advocates claiming Lopez Mercado as their own. Their voices have been instrumental in forcing people to look at Martinez Matos transpanic defense:

According to Telemundo and other local reports, Martinez Matos confessed to authorities that he picked Lopez Mercado up from the street, thinking that he was a woman.

When he realized that Lopez Mercado was a man, Martinez Matos said he regressed to an incident when he was sexually assaulted during a prison term (CNN)

Like other transphobic murder suspects, Juan A. Martinez Matos believes he is not only innocent of a hate crime but that Lopez Mercado is to blame, not only for presenting as a woman but also daring to fight back when Martinez Matos began to beat him. The story is both incredible in its level of violence and cissupremacist entitlement and all too familiar. It is that familiarity, brutality and claims of innocence based on the spectre of trans bodies, that again gives me pause about the efficacy of local and global efforts to confront transphobia in the face of Transgender Day of Rememberance. (IE, what are people doing the other 364 days of the year to prevent the list of those we mourn from getting longer each year?)

The local is on my mind as I prepare my invited statement honoring the transgender students who have lost their lives in my tenure at pov u to open our annual gathering.  As one of the only faculty willing to attend, I am again struck by the number of people afraid to speak or even to attend because of the profound transphobia and homophobia (b/c yes, some trans people are also same sex attracted for those who don’t know) of our campus. The amount of secrecy involved in putting this event together each year is its own testament to how far we have to go especially here. And the fact that I am invited to speak each year speaks less and less to me about the work I do with transgender people for equality and more and more to the relative privilege I have to be visible in these activities vis-a-vis transgender youth, students, and/or faculty here.

We have lost three transgendered people on our campus in the last 5 years, some missing and presumed dead and some clearly murdered. None of their names are amongst the documented deaths because their families re-closeted them in death or they cannot be counted because there is “no concrete evidence” that they were abducted &/or killed. We honor their truths tonight along with those taken nationally this year:

Documenting these thefts of precious life and honoring those who have passed is critical in its own right. Taking today to mourn the loss of so many is both an act of revolution ( refusing to allow anyone to forget or erase what has been done in the name of trans hatred) and needed public sorrow. Yet part of honoring the dead is speaking truth to the lives of those who live on and truth to the violence they endure to do so. Thus my words are insufficient as an opening to our local event, invited or not, insufficient in documenting the layers of pain and discrimination that lead to the ever growing list of lives lost.

In the interest of taking a backseat where I can, ie here in the space where people can talk openly and freely, unlike our campus, I invite my out transgendered readers to share their stories and I warn transphobic trolls that there is no space for them here.

The video above is actually a collaboration project between a youtube video maker and the people who responded to the call to discuss their experiences of anti-trans discrimination. You can share your story as part of new video collaborations by contacting the director directly here.

Regardless of your identity, please consider today not only a call to remember but to act WITH transgendered communities to end transphobia. Mourn today, act tomorrow and every day afterward. (You can start with the links in my posts which try to privilege links by Transgender activists and organizations or the links provided by TransgenderDOR and Remembering Our Dead)

(events in honor of Lopez Mercado will be taking place across the U.S. on Sunday, vigils for TDOR take place today)

On this Veteran’s Day

I am grateful to the members of my family who fought in wars to stop Hitler and Fascism, and glad for those members who survived the unjust war in Vietnam to make it home and fight against anymore unjust deployments and raise awareness about the real needs & rights of the Vietnamese and Cambodian people. To all the military families who have sacrificed for our safety and the safety of women and children in times of crisis and ethnic cleansing, in Somalia, Bosnia, and all around the world, thank you. I am forever grateful to those veterans who fought for freedom of enslaved African Americans, founded civil rights organizations, and continue to struggle for the equality of marginalized people inside and outside the military. And to those who continue to sacrifice and to protect innocent civilians from those on both sides who think their lives do not matter or kill them with prejudice, thank you and come home safe.

AF-Am soldier in Civil War

Black Soldiers

AfAm soldiers in WWII

ya000046

Comanche Code Talkers

780px-Comanche_Code_Talkers

American soldiers in Bosnia

mcgovern_children

Transgendered Veterans

tava logo

LGB Veterans

gay-military

Latino Veterans

latinovets

And especially to all the female veterans who not only fight for justice in our world but also in the military, with limited medical services and protection from sexual assault, thank you for your strength and your courage.

Pres Obama & Tammy Duckworth head of Illinois VA

preztammyimages unattributed

Happy 40th Sesame Street

Today is the 40th anniversary of the groundbreaking children’s television show Sesame Street. Marking this moment, and reiterating a commitment to education that was sorely lacking from the White House rhetoric in the past 8 years, First Lady Obama will be on the show today.

Billy Idol Tribute “Rebel L”

In a transparent move, Fox News wants to vilify the show b/c Oscar the grouch was in a skit in which both his fake news channel Garbage News Network and fake Pox News were referred to as “trashy.” This skit originally aired over a year ago w/out comment from either channel. The timing of Fox News’ complaint is clearly about discrediting the Obamas and continuing the Republican thread of “indoctrination from the White House” by once again targeting programming that encourages learning. 4 or more generations of children have grown up with Sesame Street without any major concern about partisanship until now, the complaint is obviously ridiculous. Worse, anyone who has ever watched Sesame knows that ‘trashy” in this context was a double entendre that children will interpret in only one way:

Sesame is not about politics but rather culturally relevant education and entertainment. It’s reach is globally, airing in translation all around the world. It has also inspired multiple other educational based children’s television in the U.S. and abroad; my personal favorite is Salsa which airs in the Southwest and in some areas of Latin America and is a Sesame Street style show with Latin@ specific cultural references.

Other shows more clearly tied to a time period or political message (or the political decision of dumbing down our youth) have come and gone, but Sesame is still with us.

And like the President’s speech on education earlier this year, that Republicans also created a huge “indoctrination” scare around, Sesame Street’s goal is to help children commit to and find joy in learning. Sesame not only teaches math and reading, it also teaches important social skills, encourages health (anyone else remember Snuffy working out to Jane Snuffleupagus?), and how to talk about & address your feelings.

If you scroll to the bottom of this post, you will also see that they have always made cultural references that make the show relevant to all ages watching, so you can put it on with older kids or adults in the room without driving them crazy the way that purple dino used to do.

So for everyone who understands parody and supports children learning in a fun and entertaining way, let’s celebrate this day together with some clips:

“La La La … L lights up your face”

“Near and Far”

Q

Counting Cookies

Harry is Sad

City and Country Equally Good

And for all you 80s folks who read the blog, who could forget

Madonna Tribute “Cereal Girl”

And for you “70s folks” who read the blog, can anyone top

Springsteen Tribute  “Born to Add”

Prefer Disco? (I used to sing this one to my little sister while dancing her around the living room; and yes we did own the Sesame Street Fever record):

Sesame Street’s 40th anniversary is a testament to what television gets right: providing entertaining, relevant, educational programming especially to children who may be under-served in their schools. Perhaps its most controversial act was daring to show a multicultural, multi-lingual cast that would appeal to children across socio-economic, linguistic, and racial backgrounds, something that does in fact frighten the folks at Fox News but is needed as much today as it was 40 years ago.

The show has never been about targeting or indoctrinating children. If we want to have a discussion about those issues, we need to turn the focus on to Republicans who have twice targeted the Obama girls’ school for political actions (first a pro-life rally in Sept. & now a tax/hcr tea bag protest yesterday that stopped traffic in the area). Both these acts intentionally targeted innocent children and made them potential problems in the eyes of the school administrators in order to vilify their father. Or perhaps, we could look at the ongoing work of Texas owned textbook companies and their successful attempts to remove liberal, radical, and socio-cultural history (including women’s rights) from text books. They have systematically removed references to some of the greatest leaders for social justice this country has ever known and down played inequality and violence against marginalized people (including the working class) with little consequence. These are the acts of indoctrination aimed at our children not a simple show that reminds us how much fun bath time is:

Happy 40th Sesame Street and thanks for all you do!

I can only hope Sesame Street is still on if and when my partner and I have children.

Hit and Run Comments Re-Post

Since the trolls have come out in force this past week, I thought I would repost a shortened version of my ” ‘Hit and Run’ Comments and How to be Productive on the Internet” post:

sawSaw II/ Dir Bousman/ Lion’s Gate Films 2005

These “hit and run” comments, where someone comes by to spew hate and then disappears into the interwebs without even waiting to see what happens, waste the energy of everyone involved. They don’t foster conversation, b/c 9 times out of 10 the person isn’t there to talk to, and they deliberately try to upset a community and derail a discussion. Unlike trolls, like those who lurked waiting for their comments to show up and be responded to, hit and runners are spewing rapid fire hate in the hopes of hitting as many people as possible before moving on to the next heavily populated area. Yet both groups discourage people from talking here b/c they create a sense of fear. Fear that conversation will degenerate into hate speech, that people responding will be sanctioned (b/c I don’t allow flame wars here even if one or more sides are right), and/or people less confident in their own grasp of the issues worry that they will be equally sanctioned if they talk. Meaning, when I approve and respond to hit and run comments, I help those people silence my regular readers. I am no longer willing to do that.

So if you are one of our 1,000 or so visitors here are some basic guidelines to participating in the conversation. YOU DO NOT NEED A COLLEGE DEGREE OR A FACULTY POSITION TO PARTICIPATE HERE AND NO ONE WILL JUDGE YOU IF YOU DON’T SPEAK ACADEMESE OR MAKE LITERARY OR HISTORICAL REFERENCES.

  1. consider the community in which you are speaking – if you take time out to learn about the blog you are on (read some posts and comment sections before talking yourself) you will be able to determine whether or not this is a place where you want to participate . While some people thrive on abusing others, participating on a blog that has similar interests to your own or discusses issues you are trying to become more informed about can actually become an important part of your intellectual and social virtual network.
  2. read the post before commenting – READ THE WHOLE THING FIRST
  3. try to add something to the conversation
  4. think of yourself as a community member
  5. Don’t expect people to caretake for you – your guilt abt benefiting from or perpetuating oppression is your problem not the people you have or are oppressing
  6. don’t cheat or be cheap – if you are advertising an actual business, film, or product, you would never go to someone else’s hard built business and plaster their windows with your advertisements, leaving a comment on someone’s blog that says “interesting post. by the way I was wondering if you would tell people about [product]” is the same thing.
  7. Always link back and credit your sources – if you take information off a blog, cite it. Blogs are intellectual property and when you don’t cite you are stealing.
  8. check your stuff at the door
  9. take long comments to your own blog – If you are wordy like me, it is especially important to think about how much you are talking and when you have crossed the line from comment to essay.
  10. Assume the best of others on the blog – people make mistakes and name calling is not ok
  11. Know the technology – if you are making a comment pay attention to whether or not the comments are on approval and/or if the blog owner is away. Many times people accuse blog owners of censoring them when they have comments on approval or have gone on vacation and so approval takes longer to happen than normal.
  12. always leave a link back to your own blog

As always, we retain the right to edit out or simply not approve comments that contain foul language, identity based insults (ie racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, etc.) or any comment that shows no understanding of the authors, comment makers, or community we have built here. We also keep documented records of IP addresses, dates, times, etc. of comments that insinuate or actually threaten anyone participating on this blog. If you have a history of threatening others or detailing physical or sexual threat against women or people of color on the internet, or instigating conflict through unsubstantiated and/or untrue claims of violence, you can assume your comments will not be approved here and that this is not the community for you.

Taylor Swift and SNL

kanyeasshatLike many feminists responding to the Taylor Swift-Kanye West controversy, I wrote passionately about the intersections of gender and age at play in West’s decision to take the microphone away from a teenage girl and then use her spotlight to demean her. As a woman of color and intersectional decolonized feminist, I also noted the ways he relied on racial narratives to condemn MTV through Swift’s win by pointing to how one time cutting edge award shows have fallen into the same pattern of exclusion and ghettoization of musicians of color as their mainstream counterparts (even if the music channels haven’t been alternative since the start of TRL) and hoped that race + gender in the form of Beyonce would trump race vs gender in the form of Kanye’s black masculinity v. Taylor’s Swift’s white femininity. He was wrong.

As I said in my original post on the issue, his behavior was steeped in heteropatriarchal assumptions that demeaned women and girls and blamed a single girl for the failings of an industry that she neither set up nor had any say in. It was a move whose offense could not be excused on either individual or structural level. And worse, it was one that despite being about sexism would clearly be read through the lens of racism, leading to racial ramifications for black men in the industry and black people in general. Beyonce’s carefully crafted response was meant to champion girls, women in music, and deflate potential racial backlash and the initial response by white female musicians seemed to underscore the need to not racialize this event but rather to focus on its clear sexism.

Unfortunately, in the days that followed, neither Taylor swift nor the general public followed this example. Taylor Swift has every right to be upset about what Kanye West did at the VMAs. No racial narrative excuses away Kanye’s offensive behavior and general arrogance in the face of a teenager winning her first moon man and realizing a long hoped for goal. He was wrong and she was clearly crushed by him. Yet, Taylor Swift has been riding a wave of racially charged disdain for West ever since. Last night that wave deposited her on Saturday Night Live as both host and musical guest, a job she would never have gotten otherwise. She used that opportunity to engage in racially offensive caricature that not only calls into question her continued reliance on the image of blue-eyed-blonde-victim to scary black male perpetrator but also reinforced it by embedding the issue in several unrelated skits throughout the night.

Thus the show began with Taylor Swift’s monologue, a song she called “La La Song” in what I assume was an ironic reference to Kanye’s slight of her musical talent in his initial insincere “apology” to her on his website the night of the VMAs. And yet, while she took pop shots at her ex-boyfriend and Kanye West, I could not help but remember his comment about her lack of talent. The song’s insipid nature failed to be ironic, though scoring a few laughs, instead  underscoring how little lyrical or musical talent Taylor Swift actually has. Add to that her current NUP_137737_0016commercial, which played twice, and her lackluster musical performances on the show where he voice broke, she failed to show musical range, and her lyrics varied little from the opening monologue in terms of focus or lyricism, and ultimately I don’t think anyone could deny that her double duties on SNL were directly related to the Kanye incident.

While there is no excuse for his behavior, it is impossible to ignore the way that Swift has moved from actual victim to astute manipulator of racial tension to her own ends. Thus she sings that she won’t say anything about Kanye because she has security, while SNL actors flank her with an artist rendering of West/wanted poster. Neither the white comedians nor the white “musician” they pretend to protect have any sense of irony or shame about reducing a black musician to a criminal for daring to steal a white one’s spotlight. The skit shows little understanding of the racial history of this nation that not only criminalizes black men regularly but also has a long history of torturing and killing them for daring to look at a white women the wrong way in public. What Kanye West did to Taylor Swift was inexcusable, but it was not criminal.

What many watching will also likely miss: after the skit was over and Taylor Swift was supposed to deliver the obligatory “We have great show for you tonight” she once again took the opportunity to dig at Kanye West, saying in an embittered voice “and no Kanye West won’t be here.” And while she has ever right to be angry about what he did,  her anger on SNL seemed to oddly stem from a place of entitlement rather than continued hurt. Given that she continues to benefit from racialized backlash against Kanye, including in her role as host, and that the show opened with such a specific linking of Kanye’s behavior to supposed black criminality vis-a-vis white innocence, her continued vehemence so t-pain-and-taylor-swiftmuch later smacked of unacknowledged privilege and investment that would become a major thread in the show itself.

The vast majority of the rest of the night was taken up with harmless and surprisingly entertaining skits. Swift’s turn as Kate Goselin was inspired depite The SNL troupe’s version of The View that continues to be mired by both problematic depictions of race and gender. Her timing was as good as the woman who played Walters. In fact, her timing was spot in so many of the skits that it was a real tragedy to see her sink into racial parody at various points in the show.

Twice in the rest of the show, Taylor Swift engaged in racialized mockery that called up the spectre of Kanye West. In both cases, she was playing stereotypically imagined characters of color with the goal of demeaning them and perpetuating the dichotomy between her “true” Barbie Doll features and those of the racial stereotypes she was emulating.

In her “black face” role, West appeared opposite the only black comedian on Saturday Night Live in a skit that has always traded on black criminality for laughs. In fake cornrows that called up West’s hairstyle without actually mimicking it, Swift would do the worst impression of a black convinct/gangsta I’ve ever seen. (Some may argue that she was playing a white character who emulates black stereotype b/c of the absence of face make up, and while I will concede that this may be the intent of the skit, Swift played it as racial passing. Had she not, she would have been mocking a certain kind of whiteness that in and of itself requires racial appropriation, but there was no aspect of her character that mocked whiteness in anyway.) While the character she played was a stereotype that does not reflect black culture, her performance, like her earlier song, spoke volumes about her knowledge of black people and her willingness to mock them. Worse, it played out like a bad impression of Kanye West during certain awkward moments, and it didn’t feel like the first time she’d done it. In fact, a little Google Search shows that Taylor Swift has “thugged out” before in the worst kind of culture appropriation because it is not only funded by the music industry but excused away because nobody gets out the paint.taylor

In what was perhaps the most ironic moment of the night however, Taylor Swift donned a jumpsuit and mocked Shakira’s musical talent in the second of the two skits. Once again passing for another race, Taylor Swift, who plays no instrument well, has multiple writers help write her songs, and has no rhythm to speak of, dared to mock an internationally known female musician who shot to stardom precisely because she played her own music, wrote her own songs, and had a soulful, lyrical, grasp of music and performance. One needs only place early videos of Shakira’s songs about love accompanied by her skillful guitar work against Swift’s whiny girl in the bleachers songs accompanied by her studio modified guitar playing to see who has the right to mock whom. Of course, that would require a knowledge of women and music that not only goes beyond the English market but also the last few weeks neither of which seem to interest Swift or her fans.

Talent aside, Swift’s real offense is racial. While Shakira’s She Wolf is dreadful, Swift’s depiction of the song relied almost entirely on making fun of Shakira’s seemingly tenuous grasp of the English language. Instead of openly mocking the 70s throw back video or the disconnect between actual lycanthropy and Shakira’s lyrics, Swift’s Shakira  was largely unintelligible. After a brief reference to her jump suit,  Swift made gutteral sounds punctuated by tongue rolling, no doubt meant to mock the way certain consonants are formed in Spanish,  and the signature “ahh ooh” taylor_swift_shakira_getty90716509of the She Wolf  song. She made no sense and that was the point. She didn’t even bother to learn Shakira’s signature dance moves, instead seemingly recreating the beginning of the undead dance from Micheal Jackson’s Thriller. In short, her Shakira was a racial caricature that denied Shakira’s dance prowess and racialized her musical performance in ways one might expect from a supremacist venue.

Swift’s depiction stands in stark contrast to other SNL skits spoofing Shakira. While these skits have also exploited Shakira’s use of the English language, the comedians portraying her have emulated her actual dancing and video style. Rather than relying on overt difference in which it is  assumed the audience is part of an insider understanding of how “ridiculous Latinas are and how hard they are to understand” like Swift’s performance did they specifically target and exaggerate real issues in Shakira’s English-language performances.

Perhaps more important than even this racially disturbing behavior, is that Shakira was the one who handed Swift her VMA award. In other words, both incidents of racial mockery on SNL intentionally or otherwise centered the Kanye West incident. And in both cases caricatures of people of color potrayed by Swift were made into buffoons. Like traditional minstrel acts her buffoonery relied on identification with whiteness and acceptance of difference defined as less than.

While the racial politics of SNL certainly lent themselves to the multiple offenses of the night, Swift consented to these portrayals. In so doing, she sent the message that she clearly believes that racial mockery and borderline black face is amusing. The centering of West at every turn made these moments speak to a rage that is very much invested in certain kinds of hierarchies that have little to do with West’s actual offense against her. The fact these offenses were likely “unintentional” or subconscious make me all the more wary of Swift.

Ultimately what her performance on SNL shows she, and her fans, need to understand is that Kanye was not acting as a black man, he was acting as a sexist self-involved moron. Taylor Swift’s willingness to capitalize on spoken and unspoken racialization of the incident coupled with her willingness to mock people of color and engage in “black face” (minus make up) should give everyone pause. Like so many mainstream women invested in oppression olympics and/or white innocence, Taylor Swift was a victim of sexism (and ageism) who continues to use her considerable access to racial hegemony to retaliate at a level that is uncalled for and increasingly offensive.

UPDATE: and the wave continues. Taylor Swift won all 4 categories in which she was nominated at the CMAs, including artist of the year, for music about day dreaming about boys from the bleachers & other high school oriented ditties. Anyone who doesn’t question the message behind this sweep, need only have seen the gathering of the other artists around her or the most offensive moment of the night when stars sung out “Mommas don’t let your babies grow up to be Kanye” amidst applause. Kanye West’s mother died one year ago last night (the night of the CMAs). In this game of entitlement and award show wrongs, where does calling a musician’s mother a failure on the 1 year anniversary of her death fit? Clearly nowhere near taking a microphone from a blonde, blue-eyed, white teen since the neither the media nor anyone from the award show has bothered to comment, including Swift. (And again, while Swift is not responsible for the milieu in which she performs, her wide-eyed willingness to capitalize on the racial backlash is troubling at best &, especially given her silence last night, fully embracing hegemony at worst.)

—-

image

  • Swift, Hader, & Sudeikis/ SNL 2009/Dana Edelson
  • T-Pain & Taylor Swift/ Getty Image
  • Swift/SNL 2009/Edelson
  • Taylor Swift & Shakira @ VMAs/ Getty Image